Electric Mining Fleet Transition: Progress and Challenges in 2025


The electrification of mining fleets has moved from concept to deployment. Battery-electric equipment is now operating at numerous sites globally, and the trajectory suggests accelerating adoption. But the transition involves more than simply swapping diesel engines for batteries – entire operational systems require redesign.

Underground Leads the Way

Underground mining has emerged as the leading application for battery-electric equipment. The reasons are straightforward: diesel emissions underground require ventilation that consumes significant energy and creates operational constraints.

Removing diesel emissions enables:

  • Reduced ventilation requirements with substantial energy savings
  • Improved air quality for underground workers
  • Smaller ventilation infrastructure in mine development
  • Access to previously ventilation-constrained areas

The business case for underground electrification is often compelling without considering environmental benefits. Ventilation can represent 40% of an underground mine’s electricity consumption. Reducing this requirement delivers direct cost savings.

Battery-electric load-haul-dump (LHD) units and trucks are now operating productively at multiple underground operations. Equipment manufacturers have developed purpose-built electric machines rather than converted diesel units, and performance is meeting operational requirements.

Surface Mining Progress

Surface mining electrification faces different economics. Diesel haul trucks in open pits don’t create the ventilation burden of underground equipment. The transition case depends more on fuel cost, equipment availability, and emissions reduction commitments.

Several parallel developments are advancing surface electrification:

Trolley assist systems provide electric power to haul trucks on ramp sections. Trucks run on diesel for horizontal haulage but switch to overhead electric power when climbing loaded. This hybrid approach reduces diesel consumption and emissions without requiring full battery capacity.

Battery-electric haul trucks are now in commercial service at several operations. Early deployments are demonstrating operational viability, though the technology remains newer than underground applications.

Hydrogen fuel cell development offers an alternative pathway for large surface equipment. Several major equipment manufacturers are developing hydrogen-powered haul trucks, with trial units expected in coming years.

Charging Infrastructure Challenges

Battery-electric equipment requires charging infrastructure that diesel equipment doesn’t need. This infrastructure represents significant investment and operational complexity.

Underground charging must occur in dedicated areas with appropriate ventilation and fire suppression. Charging stations require electrical infrastructure that many mines weren’t designed to provide. Retrofitting existing mines presents different challenges than designing new operations around electric equipment from the outset.

Fast charging versus battery swap represents a strategic choice. Fast charging minimises equipment numbers but requires equipment downtime. Battery swap systems enable continuous operation but need investment in spare batteries and swap infrastructure.

Charging scheduling affects mine productivity. Equipment that’s charging isn’t producing. Optimising charge timing to minimise production impact requires specialists in this space that integrate equipment scheduling with production requirements.

Grid connection capacity may limit electrification pace. Mine electrical systems sized for current loads may not support simultaneous charging of large equipment fleets. Upgrades can require long lead times and substantial investment.

Operational Adaptations

Electric equipment operates differently than diesel, requiring operational adaptations.

Range management becomes a planning consideration. Equipment operators need to understand remaining battery capacity and ensure return to charging before depletion. Automation systems can manage this automatically, but manual operation requires operator awareness.

Regenerative braking captures energy when equipment descends loaded ramps. This energy recovery extends range and reduces brake wear. Operations with significant elevation change benefit most from regenerative systems.

Temperature management affects battery performance. Both cold and heat can impact battery capacity and lifespan. Climate control for battery systems adds complexity but is essential for consistent performance.

Maintenance practices differ from diesel equipment. Electric drivetrains have fewer moving parts and can require less routine maintenance. But battery systems and high-voltage electrical components require specialised skills and procedures.

Workforce Implications

Electric fleet transition affects mining workforce requirements.

New skills in high-voltage electrical systems, battery management, and electric drivetrain maintenance are needed. Training programmes are developing, but workforce capability takes time to build.

Safety procedures for high-voltage equipment differ from diesel. Isolation and lockout procedures, emergency response protocols, and rescue training all require updating.

Reduced noise from electric equipment improves underground working conditions. This occupational health benefit adds to the air quality improvements that drove electrification.

Economic Analysis

The economics of electrification vary significantly by application and location.

Fuel cost sensitivity affects business cases. Operations with high diesel prices – often remote sites with expensive logistics – find electrification economics more favourable.

Electricity cost and source matters for both economics and emissions. Electrification that shifts from diesel to coal-fired grid electricity may not improve emissions outcomes. Operations with renewable electricity access have the strongest cases.

Equipment capital costs for electric units currently exceed diesel equivalents. This premium is expected to decline as production scales, but current projects must factor higher upfront costs into economic analysis.

Total cost of ownership modelling suggests electrification will become economically favourable across most applications as technology matures. The timing varies by equipment type and operating context.

Emissions Reduction Reality

Electrification delivers emissions benefits when the electricity source is clean. This linkage is essential to understand.

Operations drawing electricity from coal-dominated grids may find limited emissions benefit from electrification. The diesel emissions shift to the power station rather than disappearing.

The growing prevalence of renewable energy at mining operations changes this equation. Solar installations at mine sites can provide genuinely low-emission electricity for electric equipment charging.

Life cycle analysis should consider equipment manufacturing emissions, battery production impacts, and end-of-life management alongside operational emissions. The full picture is more complex than simple fuel switching.

Looking Ahead

Mining fleet electrification will continue accelerating. Equipment availability is improving, operational experience is accumulating, and the business case is strengthening.

The transition won’t be uniform. Underground applications will continue leading surface mining. Smaller equipment will electrify before the largest machines. And geographic variation in electricity costs and sources will affect adoption rates.

For mining companies, the question is increasingly not whether to electrify but when and how. Planning now for infrastructure requirements, workforce capabilities, and operational adaptations positions companies for successful transitions.

The internal combustion engine has served mining for a century. The electric era is beginning, and the pace of change will likely surprise those who remember how slowly mining traditionally adopts new technology.